LTA, xwiki spam

үзгәртү

Cross-wiki spam or other Meta-Wiki community views are not valid reasons for deleting content meeting local wiki policies. frhdkazan (бәхәс) 28 сен 2024, 19:42 (UTC)Җавап бирү

@Frhdkazan this user published that article on a dozen wikis (written with an automatic translator, and that's the reason for deletion from what I can see on your wiki) and has several socks blocked for the same thing [1], [2], [3]. This is simply spam from a globally locked and sockpuppeting account. AramilFeraxa (бәхәс) 28 сен 2024, 21:13 (UTC)Җавап бирү
Dear colleague, I understand your reasoning, but it's flawed, so not applicable. The content is valuable for the local wiki, it meets local policies and it is saved under CC-BY-SA, so it does not belong to the specific user anymore. This overrides any Meta comminity's views, thus even global lock is groundless, whilst sockpuppet policy of yours better reconsidered.
Don't take is personal - you were not the first global admin (and probably not the last) who is mistakenly abusing Wikimedia principles and policies on Tatar Wikipedia (and other small wikis), thinking your are doing good, but actually doing the opposite. I've explained it to WMF staff, WMCEE, WMCentral Asia and global affiliates already in Telegram chats, just no time to get to Meta so far per other local wiki and offwiki life concerns.
I don't see problems with people using automatic translation, and the material is quite Ok. Local community (other admins and active users) are informed they can either delete automated articles or vote to stop Content Translation access via Phabricator.
Regards on behalf of m:Wikimedia Language Diversity, frhdkazan (бәхәс) 29 сен 2024, 06:18 (UTC)Җавап бирү
I don't agree with you. CC: @MathXplore. AramilFeraxa (бәхәс) 29 сен 2024, 09:03 (UTC)Җавап бирү
It's Ok to disagree. Please respect local community needs though by abstaining from cultural imperialism practices of enforcing own views on others. Thanks. frhdkazan (бәхәс) 29 сен 2024, 09:40 (UTC)Җавап бирү